Monday, March 16, 2015

Islamic Philosophers and Sufis

entries written by Idries Shah 
for the Oxford Companion to the Mind (1987)


Islamic Philosophy


A traditional occidental theme is that the thinkers of Islam were mere synthesizers of Greek and other traditions (such as those of India and Persia) and made no original contribution to human thought. This simplistic view originates with the assumption that such work as that of Avicenna was the totality of Islam's philosophy: which in turn is understandable when it is realized what a profound effect Avicenna had upon the Schoolmen.

The importance of Avicenna's thought for the West cannot be overestimated. Both in its negative aspect, such as the necessity of everything, and its more sympathetic notions, it offered a stimulus to the West. It was par excellence a combination of Neoplatonism and Aristotle, transforming the One into a first mover from whom all existence ultimately sprang. For Christian thinkers it offered especial attraction in distinguishing God from His creatures in terms of being; in holding essence to be the foundation of all existence; in making the effect dependent for both its being and its movement on what was prior to it; and in regarding all knowledge as the result of illumination. (Leff 1958: 154 f.)

Characteristically, T. P. Hughes's massive Dictionary of Islam of 1885 (1964 edn., p. 452) baldly repeats: 'The whole philosophy of the Arabians was only a form of Aristotelianism tempered more or less with Neo-Platonic conceptions.' More recently this generalization has been challenged with great vigour by both Muslim and Western scholars.

The Arab conquest and occupation of eastern and western lands from the early 8th century produced intense intellectual activity in centres of learning as widely dispersed as Baghdad and Spain, Bukhara and Egypt. The study and exercise of traditional knowledge were directly linked to the Prophet's dictum, accepted with the force of law: 'Seek knowledge even unto China.' During much of the thousand years of the period known as the Dark Ages in Europe, the Islamic centres of learning were major agents for the preservation and transmission of accumulated knowledge, those of Spain especially being a magnet for Christian scholars. 'The Christian West became acquainted with Aristotle by way of Avicenna, Al-Farabi, and Algazel (Al-Ghazzali). Gundisalvus' own encyclopedia of knowledge relies in the main on the information he had drawn from Arabian sources' (Guillaume 1949: s.v. 'Philosophy and theology', p. 246).

Many Islamic theorists, including Al-Ghazzali, were even believed by European scholars of the time to be Christian divines. The widespread belief that the Arabian schools were the great source of wisdom was later replaced, particularly in Victorian thought, by the thesis that they were merely run by copyists of the Greeks. More comprehensive study from a wider perspective has indicated that original contributions began to appear as the period of translation of classics and the absorption of ancient teaching advanced, after the 8th century. Work published during the 20th century has increasingly asserted unexpected anticipations of relatively modern Western thought by the major Islamic philosophers, especially from the 9th to the 15th centuries.

Typically, M. S. Sheikh (1982: p. x and passim) has propounded themes in the systems of Al-Farabi, Avicenna, Al-Ghazzali, Ibn Khaldun, and others as prefigurings of the ideas of Descartes (methodological doubt and cogito, ergo sum) and Spinoza (idealism), of Cartesian occasionalism, of Leibnizian pre-established harmony, of Kant (antinomies of pure reason and metaphysical agnosticism), Hegel (panlogism and the notion of the absolute), and Hume (denial of causality), of Bergson's creative evolutionism, and even of logicism and positivism. The Indian Muslim poet and thinker Sir Muhammad Iqbal (1876–1938) is the best-known Islamic philosopher of modern times.

In the Islamic world, in addition to the many customary preoccupations of philosophy as expressed in logic, ethics, method, knowledge, and political thought, there were also a vast number of exponents and schools of religious philosophy and metaphysics (seen as mysticism). Among the most important were the Islamic theologians and the Sufis. The works of the latter are today increasingly studied by both East and West in newer disciplines such as psychology and sociology.

From the comparative point of view, the picture of the Islamic contribution that emerges indicates the relative freedom of speculation within the culture, as contrasted with the somewhat more restricted categories of the West in the same epoch. This may be because Islam has never had a central ideological disciplinary institution which could succeed in imposing dogmatic authority over large populations for long periods of time, and because the door of reinterpretation of the limits of philosophical speculation has remained open, being the responsibility of the courts, in the absence of a priesthood.

(Published 1987)

— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography:

De Boer, T. J. (1961). The History of Philosophy in Islam. Trans. E. R. Jones
Guillaume, A. (1949). The Legacy of Islam.
Hashimi, A. Al- (1973). Islamic Philosophy and Western Thinkers.
Hitti, P. K. (1951). History of the Arabs.
Houtsma, W. T., et al. (eds.) (1908–38). The Encyclopedia of Islam and Supplement.
Leff, G. (1958). Medieval Thought: St Augustine to Ockham.
Nicholson, R. A. (1966). A Literary History of the Arabs.
O'Leary, D. (1954). Arabic Thought and its Place in History.
Schacht, J., and Bosworth, C. E. (eds.) (1974). The Legacy of Islam (2nd edn.).
Sheikh, M. S. (1982). Islamic Philosophy.


***********

Al-Kindi

(Abu-Yusuf YaʼQub Ibn-Ishaq)
(803–73). 

The first Arab philosopher. Born at Al-Kufah, now in Iraq, of a southern Arabian family, he worked mainly in Baghdad. He attempted to combine the views of Plato and Aristotle, and his collation of the Theologia ascribed to Aristotle had considerable influence on philosophy and theology in both East and West until the time of St Thomas Aquinas.

Al-Kindi was a polymath, like almost all of the major Islamic philosophers: an optician, music theorist, pharmacist, and mathematician; he wrote 265 treatises, most of them now lost. He saw the universe as an architectonic whole, not as something to be observed piecemeal to discover causality. He asserted 'one of the most marked features of Islamic thought — the belief that there was only one active intellect for all humanity, and that every human soul was moved and informed by this separated active intellect' (Leff 1958). More of his work survives in Latin (such as in the translations by Gerard of Cremona) than in Arabic. One of his major scientific contributions was De aspectibus, on the Optics of Euclid, which influenced Roger Bacon. His works show that mensural music was studied in his culture centuries before it appeared in the Latin West.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Abdulwahab Emiri (1976). The Scientists of Islam.
Hitti, P. K. (1951). History of the Arabs.
Leff, G. (1958). Medieval Thought.
Sheikh, M. S. (1982). Islamic Philosophy.


*************


Al-Farabi

(Muhammad Ibn-Muhammad Ibn-Tarkhan Ibn-Uzlagh Abu-Nasr Al-Farabi, or Alpharabius)

(870–950). The first great Turkic exponent of Islamic philosophy. Born in Farab, Sughd, now in Uzbekistan, he studied at Baghdad and taught as a Sufi at Aleppo, now in Syria. He states that he read Aristotle's De anima 200 times; he was certainly so well versed in it that he gained the Arabic title of Al-Muʼallim al-Thani — the Second Teacher (after Aristotle). The author of over a hundred volumes, he lived simply, taking employment as a night watchman so that he could work by the light of the lantern provided.

He harmonized Greek philosophy with Islamic thinking, thus continuing the work of Al-Kindi and preceding Avicenna; his considerations covered logic and rhetoric, geometry, psychology, and politics. Baron Carra de Vaux and others state that the logic of Farabi had a permanent effect upon the thought of the Latin Schoolmen.

Farabi believed that God exists as the only ultimate reality and unity, intermediary agencies successively producing the world as we know it through conventional avenues of perception. Human society he regards as emerging through two impulses: a social contract not unlike that later proposed by Rousseau, and an urge prefiguring the Nietzschean will to power. Society, for Farabi, realizes its perfection (the Ideal City) through a ruler who has become a divine agent, or alternatively by the administration of a group of wise men, each specializing in one subject. The capacity to be detached from objects and concerns enables a human being to go beyond familiar dimensions, transcending the ignorance produced by regarding secondary phenomena, such as time and space, as primary.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Hammond, R. (1947). The Philosophy of Alfarabi and its Influence on Medieval Thought.
Sheikh, M. S. (1982). Islamic Philosophy.


************

Avicenna

(Abu ʼAli al-Hussein ibn-ʼAbdallah ibn-Sina)
(980–1037). 

Islamic philosopher and eminent physician, born at Afshana, near Bukhara, called by the Arabs Al-Sheikh al-Rais, 'Chief and Leader (of thinkers)'. His Canon of Medicine was the standard work, in Europe as in the East, until the 17th century. He was a royal physician at the age of 17.

Avicenna's philosophy exercised, through 12th-century translations, a considerable influence upon Western thinkers, his major work being the eighteen-volume Book of Recovery, written in eighteen months. He follows Al-Farabi in ideas, though his work is regarded by scholars as more lucid, dealing with the distinction between necessary and possible being. Among the terms and concepts that he bequeathed to human thought is intentio (ma ʼqulat), the intellectually intelligible. His theme is that the entire universe is constituted of essences: all existing things have specific essences. 'A horse', he says, 'is a horse.' He holds that all the senses are secondary, being divisions of an inner sense, which is common to all. All reality as we know it derives from one ultimate, unitary reality: God — but not directly. There are agencies that, in a series of actions, cause the apparent differences between phenomena.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Hitti, P. K. (1951). History of the Arabs.
Wickers, G. M. (ed.) (1952). Avicenna: Scientist and Philosopher.


***********


Ibn Hazm


(ʼAli ibn-Hazm, 994–1064)

A native of Córdoba, Spain, he was the first scholar of comparative religion, and Hitti (1951) characterizes him as anticipating theological problems only arising in Christian Europe in the 16th century. Guillaume (1949), in referring to this author of over 400 books, accepted in the West as the greatest scholar and the most original thinker of Spanish Islam (see Islamic philosophy), notes that he composed 'Europe's first Religions-geschichte and the first systematic higher critical study of the Old and New Testaments'. This is his Al-Fasl fiʼl-Milal wʼal-Ahwaʼ wʼal-Nihal (the Decisive Word on Sects, Heterodoxies, and Denominations), but he also wrote love poems. In The Necklace of the Dove he extols platonic love, and his romanticism is regarded as related to the Spanish–Arabian influence on the formation of the troubadour mentality.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Guillaume, A. (1949). 'Philosophy and theology'. In Arnold, T. (ed.), The Legacy of Islam.
Hitti, P. K. (1951). History of the Arabs.


***********


Al-Ghazzali

(Imam Abu-Hamid Ibn-Muhammad Al-Ghazzali, or Algazel)
(1058–1111). 

Born at Tus, Persia, originally a theologian and scholastic philosopher, and professor at the Nizamiyyah College in Baghdad, Ghazzali is known as Hujjat al-Islam (Proof of Islam) and is one of Islam's greatest thinkers. He decided that ultimate truth could not be attained by intellectual means, and became a Sufi. He influenced all subsequent Sufic thought as well as many Western philosophers and theologians. His Ihya Ulum al-Din (Revival of the Sciences of Religion) is a classic which is widely believed to have had a great (some believe determining) effect upon Europe, through Latin and Hebrew translations, especially in his method of criticizing hypotheses and assumptions. Jehuda Halevi (in his Khazari) follows the Ghazzalian method as found in the remarkable Incoherence of the Philosophers, and the first Hebrew translations of the influential Maqasid al-Falasifah (Aims of the Philosophers) were made by Isaac Albalagh, c.1292, and by Judah ben Solomon Nathan, c.1340. The Dominican Raymund Martin (d. 1285) used Ghazzali's arguments in his Explanatio symboli apostolorum and Pugio fidei, continually quoting the devout Islamic thinker in support of Christian ideas. St Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) also cites Ghazzali. Blaise Pascal, writing on belief in God, echoes Ghazzali's Ihya, Kimia, and other writings, while Pascal's theory of knowledge (in Pensées sur la religion) closely follows Ghazzali's book Al-Munqidh. Ghazzali's work is as widely studied today as it ever was.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Kamali, S. A. (trans.) (1963). Tahafat Al-Falasifah.
Shah, I. (1964). The Sufis.
Sheikh, M. S. (1982). Islamic Philosophy.
Watt, W. M. (1953). The Faith and Practice of Al-Ghazzali.

***********

Ibn Bajjah

(Abu-Bakr Muhammad ibn-Yahya ibn-al-Saʼigh, c.1106–38)

A major Islamic thinker, poet and musician, scientist, and mathematician, Ibn Bajjah was a forerunner of Averroës. Known to the Latin Schoolmen as Avempace, or Avenpace, he was born in Saragossa, Spain, and known in his lifetime as the prime exponent of Aristotelian thought after Avicenna. He follows Al-Farabi and his work greatly influenced Ibn Tufail. Averroës himself states that his own ideas of mind are derived from Ibn Bajjah. His ʼIlm al-Nafs (Science of the Soul) is the earliest text hitherto known that gives the gist of all the three books of the De anima of Aristotle, and he is known, among other things, to Western scholars for his theory of separate substances, which they adopted from him. In his Guide to the Solitary he deals with the soul's return to reality by detaching itself from matter.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Leff, G. (1958). Medieval Thought.



***********


Hakim Sanai 

(or Khwajah Abu-al-Majd Majdud ibn-Adam Sanai, c.1046–?1141)


A native of Ghazna in present-day Afghanistan, he was a major Sufi teacher and author, acknowledged by Rumi as one of his inspirers. He wrote an enormous quantity of mystical verse, of which his Hadiqa (Walled Garden of Truth, 1131) is his masterwork and the first Persian mystical epic of Sufism. He taught that lust and greed, emotional excitement, stood between humankind and divine knowledge, which was the only true reality. Love and a social conscience are for him the foundation of religion; mankind is asleep, living in what is in fact a desolate world. Religion as commonly understood is only habit and ritual.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah
Bibliography
Sanai, Hakim (1976). The Walled Garden of Truth. Trans. D. Pendlebury.


***********

Fariduddin Attar

(abu-Talib/Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn-Abu-Bakr Ibrahim, ibn-Mustafa ibn-Shaʼban Farid-al-Din Attar, ‘The Druggist’ d. 1220/1230)

Born at Kadkan, near Nishapur, Persia, one of the major Sufi teachers, and acknowledged by Jalauddin Rumi as one of his inspirers, Attar wrote at least 30 books. The most famous is the classical Mantiq at-Tair (The Bird Discourse, or Parliament), thought by some to have influenced Chaucer in his Parliament of Fowls. A major authoritative compilation is his Tadhkirat al-Awliya (Recapitulation of the Saints), with biographies of Sufi teachers down the centuries, partially translated by A. J. Arberry. Also highly esteemed is his Pand-Nama (Book of Counsel) and the Asrar-Nama (Book of Secrets). The Ilahi-Nama he composed while working at his pharmacy, where he had 500 patients; and it was this work which he presented to Rumi when, as a small boy, he passed through Nishapur with his father in 1212. The Mantiq is an allegory of human psychological reactions to the problems encountered on the Sufi way, with each individual bird in turn displaying his hopes, fears, and inadequacies. The birds of the world have elected the hoopoe as their leader in the spiritual quest, and he has to deal with their reactions, in the manner of a Sufi teacher. The purpose of the journey is to seek the king of the birds, the immortal Simurgh (Persian homonym for 'thirty birds'). Ultimately the pilgrims reach the throne and find, when a curtain is drawn aside, that they are looking into a mirror: the collective (human) soul is seen to be the divine one, which differentiation conceals from ordinary consciousness.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Arberry, A. J. (trans.) (1966). Muslim Saints and Mystics: Selections from the Tadhkirat.


***********



IbnʼArabi

(Ibn Al-ʼArabi, Sheikh Abu-Bakr Muhammad ibn-ʼAli Muhyiuddin, called the Greatest Sheikh/Sheikh Al-Akbar/Doctor Maximus, 1164–1240)

He was born in Murcia, Spain, a descendant of the illustrious Arabian family of Hatim Tai, and died in Damascus. His work influenced Western thought and literature: for example, Asín Palacios and others have argued for textual copying by Dante in the Divine Comedy. He was a most influential Sufi teacher who wrote, according toJami, over 500 works, mostly in Mecca and Damascus; in 1234 he himself reckoned them at 298 volumes. About 90 are extant, mostly in manuscript. Ibn ʼArabi's Tadbirat (Managements) is an important manual of Sufi training. The Fusus al-Hikam (Bezels, or Phases, of Wisdom), written in 1230, is his best-known work. Each of its 27 chapters is named after a prophet or teacher and deals with the Sufi principles which that teacher is said to represent. He is associated with the doctrine of Unity of Being (Wahdat al-Wujud), which is characterized by his critics as pantheism. Although he claimed to have no master and to have been initiated into Sufism by Khidr, a spiritual being, A. E. Affifi (1939) places him firmly in the context of the Spanish Sufi thought of his time. His work constantly appeals to the Koran and traditions of Muhammad, though his interpretations are idiosyncratic. Two other major works are The Meccan Revelations and The Interpreter of Desires, both attacked by pietists as mere love poetry but successfully defended by the author as mystical allegories. By a curious tradition in the East, pious men sporadically assemble groups of students and charge them with the literary study of Ibn ʼArabi's works. The intention is either to exhaust their capacity for research, or for them to discover the authorities who state that Ibn ʼArabi's works are not meant to be understood but to produce bafflement. This realization, according to these Sufis, drives the students to seek the current living exemplar of the teaching who alone can explain the writings.

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Affifi, A. E. (1939). The Mystical Philosophy of Muhiyid Din Ibnul Arabi.


***********

Jalaluddin Rumi

Oxford Companion to the Jalaluddin Rumi
(or Jalaluddin Muhammad Ibn Bahauddin Walad al-Khatibi al-Bakri al-Balkhi, 1207–73)

One of the greatest Sufis and a major Persian poet and thinker. Born of a royal and caliphial line of distinguished scholars in Balkh (present-day Afghanistan), he taught and died in Iconium (Konya, today Asiatic Turkey). His pen-name (literally 'of Rome' or 'the (eastern) Roman') was chosen, by poetic substitution cipher, because it represented both the town of his adoption and the Perso-Arabic word Nur ('light'). He acknowledges the Sufi masters Attar and Sanai as his 'two eyes', and they are undoubtedly his spiritual precursors. His major work is the Mathnawi-i-Maanawi (Poem of Inner Meaning), which was something like 40 years in the writing. His theme as a guide to mystical experience is that man in the ordinary state is cut off ('veiled') from higher perceptions by lower, usually emotional, stimuli. This state is often found in both the learned and the emotionalist: addiction to vice or to imagined virtue are both forms of idolatry, which cause 'veiling'. Teaching people to hate evil and covet sanctity is training in hatred and covetousness more than an approach to goodness or holiness. Bad things cannot be avoided, or good ones approached, he insists, by such crude and ignorant methods. The following major themes give an idea of his teaching.Conventional religious systems are secondary, imitative, and limited: 'Do not attach yourself to the brick of the wall — seek instead the eternal original.' A teacher is essential: 'Water needs a medium between it and the fire, if it is to heat correctly.' Laymen cannot evaluate mystical masters: ' "This ruin may seem a prosperous place to you: for me, the better place is on the King's wrist," said the Hawk. Some owls cried, "He is lying to steal our home!"' Sufi knowledge involves escaping from familiar dimensions: 'You belong to the world of dimension: but you come from non-dimension. Close the first "shop", open the second.' Knowledge of Objective Truth (God) is developed through love and self-knowledge: 'Ultimate Truth is reached by Love, that special love of which worldly love is a crude analogue: HE is within you!'

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Nicholson, R. A. (1926). The Mathnawi of Jalaluddin Rumi.
Shah, I. (1966). Special Problems in the Study of Sufi Ideas.
— —  (1974). The Elephant in the Dark.
— —  (1978). The Hundred Tales of Wisdom: Materials from the Life and Teachings of Rumi.
Whinfield, E. H. (1974). Teachings of Rumi.


************


Ibn Khaldun

(Abu-Zaid Abd-al-Rahman ibn-Khaldun, 1332–1406)

Born in Tunis, he was one of the greatest Islamic scholars of Moorish Spain, Arab ambassador to Pedro the Cruel, judge, and professor of jurisprudence at Cairo. Author of the Muqaddima (Introduction), the first analysis of history by political and social pattern, Ibn Khaldun is regarded as the 'father of the science of history' and one of the founders of sociology. A Sufi by persuasion, he is buried in the Sufi cemetery near Cairo where he died.
Ibn Khaldun was an historian, politician, sociologist, economist, a deep student of human affairs, anxious to analyse the past of mankind in order to understand its present and future ... one of the first philosophers of history, a forerunner of Machiavelli, Bodin, Vico, Comte and Cournot (Sarton 1927–48: iii. 1262).


(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah
Bibliography
Dawood, N. J. (ed.) (1967). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. Trans. F. Rosenthal.
Gellner, E. A. (1981). Muslim Society.

Sarton, G. (1927–48). Introduction to the History of Science (repr. 1975).



************

Jami

(Mulla Nuruddin ?Abdurrahman ibn-Ahmad)
1414–92). 

Jami, who was born in Jam, Khurasan, and died in Herat, modern Afghanistan, is often called the last great classical poet of the Persian language. He was a most prolific writer and a great scholar, as well as being a mystic of the Naqshbandiyya (Designers) School of Sufis. For him, God alone is absolute truth, and human duty is to reach this truth through love. In his Lawaʼih (Flashes) are the short utterances which encapsulate his teaching, while Nahfat al-Uns (Fragrances of Companionship) is a considerable work treating the lives of 611 male and female Sufi sages. His Silsilat al-Dhahab (Chain of Gold) resembles Sanai's Walled Garden, and his Baharistan(Land of Spring) may have been suggested by Saadi's Rose Garden. In personality he was remarkably straightforward and free from cant, and he expected this behaviour in others: the traditional Naqshbandi attitude. His sense of humour was remarkable. When he was on his deathbed and Koran readers had been brought in, he exclaimed: 'What is all this commotion — can't you see that I am dying?'

(Published 1987)
— The Sayed Idries Shah

Bibliography
Browne, E. G. (1964). A Literary History of Persia.
Davis, F. H. (1967). Jami, the Persian Mystic.

Friday, March 13, 2015

Sufi Literature

What Looks Like an Egg and Is An Egg? 
by Doris Lessing (1972)


There were the mice who, having learned not only to eat the poison put down for them, but to like it, ignoring the cheese in the traps, were caught because people learned to coat the cheese in the traps with poison. - Reported in The London Daily Mail, Feb. 2, 1967. 

"Do you imagine that fables exist only to amuse or to instruct and are based upon fiction ? The best ones are delineations of what happens in real life in the community, and in the individual's mental processes."- From "Reflections," by Idries Shah. 


Islamic mysticism, generally called Sufism, has a very large literature, covering several epochs in the past 1,400 years, and contained in the various cultures - Persian, Arab, Turkish and Indo-Islamic, not to mention Indonesian - in which Islam has been manifested. This literature may seem more accessible to us than other aspects of Sufism: but this is because of assumptions bred into us by our culture about "mysticism." Sufism has always been something of a mystery to Eastern scholars and Western orientalists alike. Why has it so many manifestations? How can so many people of apparently irreconcilable views belong to it? How can it be "Islamic" at all if so many apparent heretics, apostates even, have belonged to it? How can it be "mysticism" when it expresses itself so variously, in science, philosophy, literature, social organization? 


Each student or school of thought has attempted to answer these problems by finding a " thread." Each attempt has been unsatisfactory because it has involved leaving out certain material to make what is left in fit: when you are looking at Sufism you must look at who is telling you about it. Many modern commentators have tried to show that Sufism is "borrowed" from neo-Platonism, or Christianity, or Hinduism: this happens because they want to answer the question they have themselves framed: What is this derived from? 


It is in fact the variety and lack of coherence - looked at from restricted points of view - which give the clue to the nature of Sufism. The answer is that each individual manifestation of Sufism is planned. It takes the shape and follows the pattern laid down by whoever is planning it. It is not an ideology, in which one starts with objectives, and then has to convince people of the need for them, and for rigid methods. Instead, it offers "social" contexts for local activity, creating hordes of apparent anomalies that most students will not face: for instance, the Naqshbandi Sufis are said to abhor music in ritual - the Chishtis employ hardly anything else. How then can it have happened that important Sufi teachers have been initiated into both orders and several others as well? People have been amazed that Rumi had disciples from all local religions and did not convert them to the ideology in which he was supposedly rooted: Islam. But this could easily be seen to be because he did not need to do so in order to offer the action of Sufis'. People find it impossible to explain how Hallaj (executed for apostasy for saying "I am God! " ) could be revered as one of the great Sufis by devout Moslems down the centuries. 


Both in science and in logical human thought in the "soft" sciences the principle is universally accepted that the most likely explanation based on the facts is the hypothesis that should be taken as the probable truth about the matter being studied. This principle holds good in the study of Sufism. If Haji Bektash, a descendant of Mohammed and a Shiah (believer in the divine right to rule subsisting in the House of Ali), and Abdul-Qadir of Gilan, a descendant of Mohammed and a Sunni (believer in rulership subsisting in majority opinion of the whole body of believers), could both found Sufi systems and both be regarded as eminent Sufis -although Shiahs and Sunnis have regularly shed one another's blood - the basic connection is not in ideology at all, but in method. 


The Sufis themselves seldom conceal that they are concerned with presentation and effectiveness, not indoctrination. Hence their writings are littered with phrases like "The color of the wine is the same as the color of the bottle," or, "Right time, right place, right people are necessary." 


The importance of realizing these characteristics of Sufism is that otherwise local expressions of Sufism suited to one time or place might be taken as unalterable dogma ; failure to observe the temporary nature of Sufi formulation forces scholars to choose arbitrary categories and hence label certain Sufis as genuine and others as less so. Even more important, the mere imitation of Sufi organization and activity promotes the growth of false cults...


... But what are the "teachings" of Sufism, if they are not what we have been led to expect? "Wisdom is not in books - only some of the ways to search for it," is a dictum. 


But, while Sufis can teach and have taught without words, using gestures, atmospheres, decorations on carpets and ceramics, for us the "vehicle" is words, since that is how our brains are programmed; it is hard for us, indeed impossible, to think in any other way. 


Books must not be made into "idols" - but we can approach Sufism remembering that the teachings are partly contained in the lessons, the story-structures, the reports of human interchanges, which are part of this body of literature...


Perhaps the best introduction to the body of  [Idries] Shah's work is his first book - his first about Sufism: he has written on many subjects, from travel to magic, anthropology, music, geology. "The Sufis" remains the most comprehensively informative. And one is immediately forced to use one's mind in a new way, because it is not written within our formulas for exegetics. It unfolds like a branch, and to accumulate factual information, let alone the deeper ranges of the material, means to expand one's attention, to abandon the if-and-therefore, a, b, c, d, way of thinking that is the way we have all been trained. There is no index; this demonstrates a good many different things about our memory, and certain dependencies of the mind. 


"The Way of the Sufi" also sets out to cover ground; it contains everything from the use of contemplating materials to classical Persian literature chosen to compare its surface meaning with its deeper levels. I wish I could have the experience of reading this book again for the first time: it was like a door opening where one least expects it. 


But perhaps the most shocking to our assumptions about "mysticism" is "The Pleasantries of the Incredible Mulla Nasrudin," the corpus of Nasrudin "jokes," deliberately created to inculcate Sufic thinking, to outwit The Old Villain, which is a name for the patterns of conditioned thinking which form the prison in which we all live. 

A wag met Nasrudin. In his pocket he had an egg. 

"Tell me, Nasrudin, are you any good at guessing games?" 

"Not bad." 

"Very well then, tell me what I have in my pocket." 

"Give me a clue then." 

"It is shaped like an egg, it is yellow and white inside, and it looks like an egg." 

"Oh I know," said Nasrudin, " it is some kind of cake..."


(Continue reading the full article at the Idries Shah Foundation.)

The Foundation

News from The Idries Shah Foundation:


In collaboration with The Octagon Press and the Estate of Idries Shah, The Foundation will be making all the published works of Idries Shah available online as eBooks.

In addition, an archive devoted to Shah's work and life will be put online, including video and audio material.

A further project will continue to ensure that Idries Shah's corpus of work is published in both Oriental and Occidental languages.


--------------------------------------


We are planning to put online material of interest to readers of Shah’s work.

Before his death in November 1996, Shah made it known that the large body of work he published during his lifetime formed a course within itself.

This work, he said, was to be regarded as his successor. 


---------------------------------------



Idries Shah devoted his life to collecting, selecting and translating key works of Eastern Sufi classical literature, adapting them to the needs of the West and disseminating them in the Occident.

Called by some ‘practical philosophy’, by others ‘templates in straight thinking’ – these works represent centuries of Sufi thought aimed at the development of human potential to its fullest extent.

They stress virtues such as commonsense, clear-thinking and humour to counter cant and religious dogma.

As such they may be viewed as an antidote to radicalism and fanaticism much needed in the world today.

The Idries Shah Foundation exists to make sure that these works remain available to the public – both in the East and in the West.

Visit http://www.idriesshahfoundation.org/



****************


"... my successor is my printed work. My books form a complete course, a Path, and they succeed when I cannot be there."

- Idries Shah, 1995 (as quoted by Tahir Shah, In Arabian Nights, 2008.)




*****************



"We have done all we can to embody as much of the teachership function as we can in the literature itself which we have published, largely we have been able to do this by excluding a lot of extraneous and external accretions ...

"We have been able to reconstitute the emphasis of the stories, so instead of their being instruments only to make you think how great the spiritual master is and how nothing you are, and how wonderful the possibilities of the situation are, we have retrieved the dynamic of the stories in order to show aside from those things what is possible ... what is called in some disciplines enlightenment, can be in the Sufi process, the result of the falling into place of a large number of small impacts and perceptions (from these stories and one's own experiences) producing insights when the individual is ready for them.

"We view Sufism not as an ideology that molds people to the right way of belief or action, but as an art or science that can exert a beneficial influence on individuals and societies, in accordance with the needs of those individuals and societies ... Sufi study and development gives one capacities one did not have before."

-- Idries Shah, 1976, from the lecture entitled 'Learning from Stories.'

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Earth-Sickness

Excerpt from Observation of a Sufi School
by Hoda Azizian
(1980)

'There are certain "tests" which occur while you are being prepared for enlightenment. If the negative side of these appeals to you, you will remain one of the "people of the world ", or "people with Earth-sickness." THE TESTS ARE NOT SECRET, SINCE YOU CANNOT CAMOUFLAGE YOUR REACTIONS TO THEM. They include:

1. Being given an ultimatum, or being asked to choose between two people or two courses of study or two forms of behaviour. Whoever asks you to choose between him and others is the false "Teacher".

2. If you are given anything to say or do in a language foreign to you (in the West this means such things as phrases in Persian or Arabic to repeat), this is done by a false teacher.

3. No true Sufi meetings are held more than once a week.

4. If you are told, or if it is hinted to you, that 'something important is going to happen soon,' know that you should abandon that group and seek the alternative.

5. Any supposed Sufi wearing clothes or other apparel foreign to the country in which he is living, or which he visits, means that you should avoid such a man.

6. Any alleged Sufi teacher who claims or implies that he is 'on the Path of Blame' (deliberately courting unpopularity) is false. This is never claimed by real Sufis, since the Path of Blame must be anonymously trod.

7. Anyone who says or does anything in your presence implying that he has influence in affairs of the world and is exercising it, is not a Sufi teacher; unless he is on the Path of Blame, in which case he is not an instructor but is only there to signal that you, too, must shun him, and approach the legitimate source of the Teaching which is always present under such circumstances.

8. No real Sufi will claim or imply supreme Mastership, or being a Qutub, or Concealed Teacher; though former dervishes (representatives for limited purposes) of Sufis may do so, if they have succumbed to the temptation of exercising power.

9. Similarly, the assumption of military, clerical or official rank is a sign of the deterioration of faculties (earth-sickness) which can attack anyone, and which is often found among channels, (i.e., people who, though not Sufis, may be related to some of them and employed for low-level and preparatory or 'test' work).

10. The following signs are common when Sufi teachership is claimed by those not entitled to it: assumption of importance; loss of physical co-ordination; convincing others (as a major characteristic) that one is taking a deep interest in them, especially when they are ill or in distress; mysteriousness and hinting; tolerating the deluded; confusing friendship with teaching; organizing inconsequential journeys; allowing one's hand to be kissed; appearing on platforms with "other mystics "; believing that Sufi teaching is a matter of individual opinion, not of inevitability in techniques; allowing exercises (Zikr) to be carried out without supervisors to intervene at appropriate moments. '

I sought elucidation of the foregoing statement from an authoritative Sufi source because of the problem raised by its method of phrasing. Reference is made both to 'testing' and also to 'falsity'. Which were we dealing with, I wanted to know: false schools or genuine schools which wanted to test actual or potential members?

The answer to this illuminated a further dimension of Sufi understanding:

'There are three conditions under which any or all of the considerations referred to may exist. These are: (a) the false Sufi school or the deluded one (former school now in decay); (b) the legitimate school applying tests; (c) the representative(s) of a Sufi school who have developed "Earth-sickness " (though not themselves Sufis, have through vanity arrogated to themselves the rank of Sufi, generally adopting high pretensions.)

In reality, though not in appearance, all these "work together", just as, say, fire and water "work together," to produce steam. '

I then asked what the observer, or individual desirous of approaching or remaining in a Sufi school, should do if he or she were confronted with any of the phenomena of 'Earth sickness' and supposed teachers.

'This condition,' I was told on high authority, 'never occurs unless the authentic Teaching is also accessible. The individual or group should turn to the legitimate teacher who will always be standing by. The commonest form is form (c), when the low level "messenger "of the Sufis decides to present himself as a teacher instead of a conduit. He will have been chosen as a secondary-ranking individual precisely because he will still have had such negative characteristics as vanity and the desire for power too strong in him. Such people are generally given these roles as a possible way of eliminating their bad characteristics. They tend, however, to fail in the attempt, and to choose the path of "false Sufism". It is these who are described in the (Sufi traditional) phrase, "The channel transmits the water but does not itself drink".'

As to why the errant 'channel' should develop such precise characteristics as 'loss of physical coordination, organising of inconsequential journeys, the assumption of military, clerical or official rank' and so on, the only answer obtainable from high Sufi sources was: 'All these tendencies are well-established symptoms of the result of the triumph of environmental influences on the weak mentation of those who have preferred power to enlightenment. To detail why this happens in this way would be unproductive. As with any illness, the areas attacked weaken first.'

But could this kind of malaise assail people of otherwise great achievements or of reputable Sufi connections?

'All Sufi connexions are reputable. All human beings are vulnerable to "Earth-sickness ". There cannot be any exceptions.'

'How is the ordinary individual to know when his (or her) "Sufi" teacher is afflicted in this way?' I asked.

'By applying the assessment of common sense to the problem, just as one does with anything else. It is not necessary for the Sufi to behave in an absurd fashion in order to carry out his mission. But it is likely that a false, deluded or maimed one will.'

'If such is the case with Sufi teachers, does it apply too to those of other persuasions?' was my next question.

'The Sufis are not a persuasion, they are people who have seen something beyond ordinary perception and who therefore know how to act to make this perceptible to others. But if you mean by this question, "are people who are involved in spiritual matters susceptible to deterioration?" the answer is, "Yes, all of them, as you will see from the abnormal behaviour of supposed teachers, from time to time, in all religious fields."'

'How, then, should the person interested in the Sufis, or in any other spiritual group, defend himself (herself) against false, deluded or disabled "teachers"?' I wanted to know.

'If there is anything about such a "teacher" which is regarded as abnormal, repulsive or objectionable by a majority of ordinary (non spiritually-minded) people, especially when they are informed of all the facts about this individual known to the followers of the "teacher", then you will know that he is undesirable. This is, again, because, although the true Sufi teacher is other-worldly, he has as a major task the need to present himself as thoroughly acceptable in every way, in every action, in all respects, as acceptable to the ordinary members of the wider community in which his work is set.'

'Does that mean that the unregenerate individual may well be better fitted to judge the Sufi teacher than the disciple?'

'No. It means that the unregenerate is better fitted to see through the false "Sufi" than the self-deluded. This is why real Sufis seek their disciples from among normal people, often those who have no background in metaphysics. Remember that those who stay with the false or untrue "Sufi" are almost always people who had a background of bizarre "spirituality" before they met him. He makes little progress with normal people, just as the legitimate Sufi makes real progress with virtually nobody else.'

I have dwelt on this subject because one can find so little featured on it in spiritual writings in general. It is felt that this fresh information, even though it is supported by traditional Sufi writings and other teachings, is neglected, and therefore contributes to the general knowledge of the subject, and adds to the information-stock available to researchers.

From Sufi Thought and Action, assembled by Idries Shah (Octagon Press, 1990) pgs. 131-135