Thursday, November 29, 2012

Meditation


Meditation Method
MIR S. KHAN


AFTER FOLLOWING INDICATIONS of the theoretical dynamic behind
traditionalistic meditation activity, it was when I was studying
with Gulbaz Khan of Kalat (Baluchistan) that I came
across what might be termed a developed theory of pupilteacher
meditation. This is attributed to the remotest antiquity;
though why it should be claimed that it was practised by 'Noah,
Joseph, Jesus, Elias and Salman the Persian' especially, I cannot
say.



 In summary, the theory holds that there is a certain
element in the human being which strives towards perfection.
This element (Nafs-i-Haqiqa = the True Being) will attach itself
to anything—men, objects, ideas—in the hope of finding some
conductor which will bring it to 'maturity' (Pukhtagi). When it
comes into contact with a correct source of conduction—a
teacher, it feeds itself for a time on his knowledge. This is the
phase of attachment to a teacher. If the teacher accepts the
pupil, he will first of all teach interchange concentration exercises.
In these the mutual bond is strengthened.



The next step is for the teacher to induce the students
to interchange with one another, which they do by meeting regularly
and all taking an interest in some common theme. They may think
that they are learning something from that theme. In fact, they are
becoming attuned to one another.



Next comes the phase in which the
pupils are able to spend some time, at will, interchanging with
the teacher and with one another. When this stage has been
reached, they have attained a form of directing capacity over
their spiritual life. The next form of meditation is when different
subjects of meditation are given to each student. Now each has
three types of practice. After that comes the succession of
meditation. The whole community following signals from the
teacher or his deputy (Khalifa) first collect themselves, then
meditate upon themselves, then upon the teacher, then upon
an object or idea, then upon the private objects or ideas. In this
way, it is believed by the mystics of the Chishti, Qadiri and other
schools, the human capacity for connection with superior
cognition is practised and brought to fruition.

 


MIR S. KHAN is of nomadic extraction, and has
written and broadcast on a wide variety of subjects.
He has made sociological studies of the Berbers and
the Afghan Kochis, and his despatches have been
published in The Times of London, used by the British
Broadcasting Corporation, and appeared widely in the
general press in many countries. He is a member of
several Sufi Orders.



No comments:

Post a Comment